• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Our mission is to construct belief in blockchains, and as a trusted investigative accomplice to governments around the world, preventing terrorists from using cryptocurrency is one of our main responsibilities. It’s a critical activity, and it’s essential to be responsible and judicious when releasing data on a subject as consequential as terrorism financing. False experiences can't solely misinform evaluation, but in addition injury the repute of particular person cryptocurrency companies and the business as a complete.

Over the past a number of months, three cases of erroneous evaluation led to deceptive headlines that proceed to unfold worry. We’d prefer to make some clarifications. This week, tales circulated that Hans-Jakob Schindler, crypto-crawler director of the suppose tank the Counter Extremism Project, said that authorities have looked for ISIS’s lacking war chest since 2017 and that he is questioning if the $300 million has not been discovered because cryptocurrency "might have been one of many ways it might have been used…

This would be an excellent storage mechanism until it is required.

Whereas Schindler’s statement means that he does not have arduous proof and is speculating on a idea, media sensationalized it into headlines together with "Fears missing ISIS tens of millions are hidden in cryptocurrency ready for use as battle chest," "ISIS has £246million Bitcoin war chest to spend on bloody terror comeback marketing campaign, professional warns," and "ISIS’s $300 million conflict chest is hidden in Bitcoin, says suppose tank". Schindler’s theory can be extremely unlikely.

We all know that most terrorism financing campaigns have raised less than $10,000, indicating restricted adoption. Further, if ISIS had funneled oil proceeds into Bitcoin, buying and selling volume of regional exchanges and money service companies would have reflected this flow of funds. Of course, cryptocurrency can also be not necessarily the ideal storage mechanism for illicit funds. Not like cash and different conventional types of value switch, cryptocurrency is inherently transparent.

Each transaction is recorded in a publicly visible ledger. With the right tools, we will cease bad actors from abusing the system for terrorism financing and different crimes.

We noticed one other unfortunate instance of misinformation spreading earlier this 12 months when stories mischaracterized the dimensions and scope of a terrorism fundraising campaign run by In style Resistance Committees (PRC) by way of Cash4PS, a cash service business based mostly in Gaza.

Information tales acknowledged the group had raised nearly $24 million. We broke down how we used Chainalysis Reactor to indicate that if PRC raised any money at all, it was considerably lower than $24M. There have been two errors that led to this mistaken conclusion. First, analysts began off assuming that every one transfers to Cash4PS addresses had been related to terror financing. Whereas some Cash4PS addresses may belong to terrorist teams or their associates, there’s no proof to counsel all of them are.

Second, analysts relied on a generic blockchain explorer, which does point out that upwards of $24 million worth of Bitcoin has been acquired by Cash4PS addresses. Nevertheless, the majority of these transfers are from other Cash4PS addresses. Total, just under $1M has been transferred to Cash4PS addresses from the outside.

Bitcoin funds facilitated the Easter Sunday Sri Lanka bombings carried out by ISIS.